Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
War on Women by JediSenshi War on Women by JediSenshi
I received these links on my Twitter account and decided to make a stamp about it.

As if rhetoric weren't bad enough, states like Kansas have in development actual laws to further brutalize women's rights to control their own bodies and their health care. [link]

Also Arizona Senate Passes Bill Allowing Doctors To Not Inform Women Of Prenatal Issues To Prevent Abortions [link]

Makes me glad I live in Canada.

Stamplate by :icondoitforthelulz:, Done using Paint.NET.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconkomatsuzaki-xingqi:
Komatsuzaki-Xingqi Featured By Owner Mar 1, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Bawwww war on women BAWWWWWWW!!!!
Reply
:iconpeteseeger:
PeteSeeger Featured By Owner Jun 21, 2014  Student Writer
Then stop the war on babies.
Reply
:iconxxemperorbotzxx:
xXEmperorBotzXx Featured By Owner May 18, 2014  Student Artist
Geet over itt
Reply
:icontheawesomehotdog:
TheAwesomeHotDog Featured By Owner Apr 7, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Mitt Romney <3
Reply
:iconmoonlitinuyasha1985:
moonlitinuyasha1985 Featured By Owner Feb 9, 2013
Dang.:(
Reply
:iconpeacefulinvasion:
peacefulinvasion Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
OMG hasn't the supreme court already ruled abortion to be CONSTITUTIONAL!?

This is just imposing on woman's rights. This is really bothering me because Colorado pretty much nearly passed a bill banning abortion all together. Luckily it failed to pass. It scares me though because if that bill would pass woman who were raped or who's lives are in danger would end up being in danger.

As for that Arizona law, I say thats just bullshit. A doctor needs to be inclined to inform the woman "hey this pregnancy will kill you." This only proves pro-lifers are ONLY pro-life for the fetus. They do NOT give a shit if the mother ends up dead they only care about the fetus and thats flat out murder right there.

Pro-life is just as pro-murder as pro-choice.
Reply
:iconjedisenshi:
JediSenshi Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Also they don't shiv a git about the fetus once it's born.
Reply
:iconpeacefulinvasion:
peacefulinvasion Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Yah once that fetus is a baby its on its own.
Reply
:iconaaaaceace:
aaaaceace Featured By Owner Jun 25, 2014
Now that's a little harsh. Many pro lifers support seeing more government money given to unexpected and single mothers. They also support abortions in case of rape or if it is a danger to the mother's health. The problem is we have a bunch of religious extremest running around screaming there heads off so we never hear the more sense able pro lifers. So to all those pro life extremest out there that wish to control the lives of women you never meet, HOW ABOUT WE GET YOU PREAGNENT AND FORCE YOU TO SQUEEZE THE BABY OUT YOUR TINNY COCK?!! WILL YOU BE ANTI ABORTION THEN!!!?
Reply
:iconpeacefulinvasion:
peacefulinvasion Featured By Owner Jun 25, 2014  Hobbyist Artist
True as long as you plan to adopt and make exceptions for rape and to save her life (or at LEAST to save the mom) I wont ridicule you
Reply
:iconmatthew-lane:
matthew-lane Featured By Owner May 17, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Neither one of those links is a war on women. The first is about not giving anyone a free lunch, which i see as pretty darn fair. An the second link is the “wrongful birth” bill, which was passed not to stop abortions, but to stop the legal system being filled to capacity with frivilious malpractice lawsuits, if a child is born with an undetactable birth defect, such as congenital deafness. It does not prevent a doctor from being sued if he knowingly & with malice doesn't inform the parents of a serious potential problem, nor does it prevent him from being sued for breaking other criminal medical laws.

Please, in the future actually read the legilation you are railing against.
Reply
:iconpeacefulinvasion:
peacefulinvasion Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Its still infringing upon the woman's life. You have the right to know what goes on within your body. In medicine if a small problem goes unnoticed especially in pregnancy it can become a serious life threatening condition. You have every right to know that your child will be born with a serious condition so if you choose not to abort you can brace yourself (which I wont abort unless I know it is best for the child).
Reply
:iconmatthew-lane:
matthew-lane Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
"Its still infringing upon the woman's life"

No actually its not. Women don't actually have any right to free anything. Getting things for free is a privilege, not a right.

An the small things that go wrong in medicine are undetectable, which is why the law was put in place. Because people were suing doctors over wrongful life claims, where the mother is claiming that had they known that there was a chance of something like congenital deafness she would have aborted.

There are no tests for those kinds of defects: They are not obvious prior to birth & sometimes not obvious for quite some time after birth. The law was constructed not to stop women from making an informed choice, but to stop post birth buyers remorse linked to malpractice lawsuit pay days.
Reply
:iconpeacefulinvasion:
peacefulinvasion Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Ok you say that a woman knowing what goes on in her OWN body is a privilage?

So wait your saying that all prenatal care is free? I saw nothing saying that paying for it changes anything. Besides the POINT of government funded prenatal care is to idk make sure a woman goes through a healthy pregnancy? I'd rather tax dollars go to making sure the mother survives the pregnancy and/or doesn't go through a high risk pregnancy then for tax dollars to go to allowing a woman to die. It makes about as much sense as making government funded health care that doesn't cover hospital bills of any kind.

So what your saying is if you have a heart condition or a high risk for a heart attack you know what? its minor so its your privilage to know. You have pre-diabetes so its your privilage to know. You see what i'm saying? If a doctor knows something is wrong then he needs to give out the information.

At the end of the day if there is an issue with the pregnancy its the woman's right to know. If the doctor sees a medical condition the child might have the woman NEEDS TO KNOW! Why don't we just provide free health care and not even cover preventative care if were going to do that with prenatal care?
Reply
:iconmatthew-lane:
matthew-lane Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
"Ok you say that a woman knowing what goes on in her OWN body is a privilage?"

No, i'm not saying that at all. In fact there is nothing in my reply at all that would indicate that as a view. My view was pretty straight forward. The law in question exists because there are a plethora of conditions that cannot be screened for. An because Americans all believe they deserve a free ride, mothers who have discovered there off spring has a genetic defect that are impossible to screen for, or really hard to screen for accurately have been suing for malpractice under the wrongful birth laws.

All this law does is stops GP's/Doctors/Physicians from being sued over things they had no way to test for, or whose tests are so very inaccurate that they cannot be relied on to be accurate.

The law was passed, with nothing to do with abortion rights, either pro life or pro choice bias.
Reply
:iconpeacefulinvasion:
peacefulinvasion Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Then why doesn't the bill cover the conditions that are not detected instead of the ones that are? Why doesn't it just not hold the doctor accountable for the conditions that are NOT detectable instead? Can you explain that.

If something has been detected the woman has the right to know period. Its only covering that which has been detected. It says nothing about the undetected conditions.
Reply
:iconmatthew-lane:
matthew-lane Featured By Owner Feb 8, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
"Then why doesn't the bill cover the conditions that are not detected instead of the ones that are?"

It does. But as with my previous reply you read what you thought was in there & ignored what was actually written.
Reply
:iconpieladyusa:
pieladyUSA Featured By Owner Apr 16, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I think BOTH the mother and father have a right to know if the child will have issues out of the womb, but aborting a child simply because they have a physical and/or mental disorder is cruel and oppressive of the handicapped minority. If anything, the parents need to know so that they can either a) prepare themselves to care for their special needs child or b) set up the kid for adoption if they are unable to support the child.
Reply
:iconglass-tongued:
Glass-Tongued Featured By Owner Feb 8, 2013
Or c) Abort it.
Reply
:iconaclockworkkitten:
AClockworkKitten Featured By Owner Nov 20, 2013  Student Digital Artist
Well, is it okay to abort a child solely because it might have autism or Down's syndrome?  Is that fair?
Reply
:iconpieladyusa:
pieladyUSA Featured By Owner Feb 8, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
The Nazis would like your way of thinking.
Reply
:iconglass-tongued:
Glass-Tongued Featured By Owner Mar 22, 2013
And Godwin would love you using his law.
Reply
:iconpieladyusa:
pieladyUSA Featured By Owner Mar 22, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I'm sure he would ;)
Reply
:iconglass-tongued:
Glass-Tongued Featured By Owner Mar 22, 2013
I wouldn't take pride in that if I were you.
Reply
:iconpieladyusa:
pieladyUSA Featured By Owner Mar 22, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Who said I did?
Reply
:iconglass-tongued:
Glass-Tongued Featured By Owner Mar 22, 2013
If you're not proud of it, then why would turn to Godwin's Law in the first place? If you knew comparing me to a Nazi was stupid and horribly ignorant, then why say it if you didn't mean it?
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconpeacefulinvasion:
peacefulinvasion Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Honestly I will agree however, as for aborting the child for a mental/physical disorder you need to understand something.

It depends on the situation. Autism, Missing limbs, those i'd say are an outrage. But if its more severe like say the baby is said to die less then 2 years after birth, destined to live a life not worth living (like say brain dead vegitable) then by all means abort to avoid the child's suffering. I'd rather be aborted then end up as a brain dead child suffer and die. I'd rather have my suffering to end before it began.
Reply
:iconpieladyusa:
pieladyUSA Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I dunno about that. I have heard too many stories of women who chose to carry their baby, despite that they would die minutes, hours, or days after their birth, and they did not regret the choice (and in some cases, the baby came out perfectly fine). It was not easy, but they felt that they at least gave their children a chance at life.
Reply
:iconpeacefulinvasion:
peacefulinvasion Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Personally, I'd regret giving birth to a fetus if it turned out to have suffered greatly and die about a few days later. Sure if i knew the fetus has a fighting chance by all means I'll go through with the pregnancy. If I knew it would have some quality of life i'll go through with the pregnancy.

However if it doesn't even have a chance and I knew even if it survived it wont have any quality of life I already made the decision i'd abort the baby in order to prevent it from suffering.
Reply
:iconmatthew-lane:
matthew-lane Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
"It depends on the situation. Autism, Missing limbs, those i'd say are an outrage. But if its more severe like say the baby is said to die less then 2 years after birth, destined to live a life not worth living (like say brain dead vegitable) then by all means abort to avoid the child's suffering. I'd rather be aborted then end up as a brain dead child suffer and die. I'd rather have my suffering to end before it began."

he law does not allow doctors/physicians from disclosing those details. In fact it specifically says that if a doctor does not disclose those he is still culpable to a malpractice suit.
Reply
:iconpeacefulinvasion:
peacefulinvasion Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
First of all a woman has EVERY right to know what goes on in her body and with the baby developing in her body. A small problem can turn into a big problem if not taken care of early. With pregnancy this is especially true. It could turn from a higher risk to dangerous just like that.


Lets just have free health care pay tax money and not even include heath care within the free health care. Its logical right?
Reply
:iconmatthew-lane:
matthew-lane Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
"First of all a woman has EVERY right to know what goes on in her body and with the baby developing in her body"

Seriously, are you actually reading what is written.

Me: I like chocolate
You: YOU HATE ALL WOMEN!

Seriously, go back & read what was actually written & don't asume you know what is written before you start reading.
Reply
:iconpeacefulinvasion:
peacefulinvasion Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Your accusing me of not reading lets go back to the comment I responded to.

"No actually its not. Women don't actually have any right to free anything. Getting things for free is a privilege, not a right."

Lets see I mentioned free in my response but I don't recall in the first comment me ACTUALLY saying free. Its kind of hypocritical of you to shove words in my mouth and not read.


"An the small things that go wrong in medicine are undetectable, which is why the law was put in place. Because people were suing doctors over wrongful life claims, where the mother is claiming that had they known that there was a chance of something like congenital deafness she would have aborted."

Undetectable is the key word. This bill is covering what the doctors DETECT not what they fail to detect. This says if a doctor notices a problem they can withhold it for the SAKE of avoiding abortions. Pretty much it is indeed to prevent abortions otherwise it would cover more than just pregnancies.

"There are no tests for those kinds of defects" again the bill isn't covering what the doctors do NOT detect it only covers what the doctors do detect. The small problems detected can turn to bigger problems. Then the mother ends up dead. IDK i'd rather put a mothers life over the career of a doctor who kept vital information secret.

Now then what you put,

"Me: I like chocolate
You: YOU HATE ALL WOMEN!
"

My translation is
Me: *says something based upon what you wrote
you: YOUR A RABID FEMINIST! YOUR ACCUSING ME OF HATING WOMEN!

See how annoying that is when I cram words into your mouth? Please think before you type and learn to debate in a mature manor. Your not a little kid so don't act like one. As for reading practice what you preach.
Reply
:iconjedisenshi:
JediSenshi Featured By Owner Apr 16, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
The severity of the disorder could be a deciding factor also.
Reply
:iconel-drago-800:
El-Drago-800 Featured By Owner Apr 12, 2012
These psychos won't be happy until women are basically turned into broodmares, hooked up to artificial insemination machines that go off every 9 months. Misogyny at its finest people.
Reply
:iconask-war:
Ask-War Featured By Owner Apr 15, 2012  Professional Artist
Exactly. "We love women! We trust them! Except when they have a choice we don't like!"
Reply
:iconask-war:
Ask-War Featured By Owner Apr 10, 2012  Professional Artist
Make the war as bloody as you can.
Reply
:iconbladez636:
Bladez636 Featured By Owner Mar 20, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I have more respect for women than I do my own sex; and what's happening is a pretty good way for me to sum up why I do.

I'm waiting for the Republicans to consider masturbation as abortion; it doesn't get more ridiculous. But then again; with this war on women; masturbation is the only loving their ever going to get.
Reply
:iconstarlow-ftw:
Starlow-FTW Featured By Owner Mar 15, 2012
Everything is a war on women, non-Christians, minorities, or some combination of the above. Sounds like a good deal. When will I get my free money for a change?

I'm not a fan of the Arizona bill either, and I'm pro life as can be.
Reply
:iconalbtraums-adopts:
Albtraums-Adopts Featured By Owner Mar 14, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
oh look another pro abortion stamp. don't you people get tired of killing babies? what, soon this bil to kill babies after they are born will be passed and the world will end.
Reply
:iconfancyfox01:
FancyFox01 Featured By Owner Aug 26, 2012  Hobbyist
Pro - Abortion? Nope, just Pro-Choice. Not every abortion is caused by horny teenagers who just want the party life. Sometimes the woman can have health problems she may not want to pass onto the baby, or maybe she was raped. Or maybe she's flat out not ready for a child, financially, or emotionally. I believe it should be legal for women to choose wither or not the have a child.
Reply
:iconmagiceve:
MagicEve Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2012
:iconfryplz: I'm not sure if you're trolling or just stupid.
Reply
:iconalbtraums-adopts:
Albtraums-Adopts Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Niether. they really are trying to get a bill into office that will always babies to be killed after they are born.
Reply
:iconglass-tongued:
Glass-Tongued Featured By Owner Feb 8, 2013
LOL. Right. I would like a damn cited source for that, kid.
Reply
:iconalbtraums-adopts:
Albtraums-Adopts Featured By Owner Feb 9, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
First off i'm not a kid, bitch.
second, you want a link to something from months ago that i could give two shits less about now?
Reply
:iconglass-tongued:
Glass-Tongued Featured By Owner Mar 22, 2013
You are a kid because you act like one and you're grammatically stupid like one.

If you could give two shits about replying, you could have given two shits by also providing a link, kid.
Reply
:iconalbtraums-adopts:
Albtraums-Adopts Featured By Owner Mar 23, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
And you're some trash on the internet who isn't acting any better.
Reply
:iconglass-tongued:
Glass-Tongued Featured By Owner Mar 26, 2013
"Not acting any better"? I asked you to provide a link to your claims and you choose to focus on the fact that I called you "kid" like the idiot you are. If you're going to keep responding, then stop being a whiny little twat and actually do something relevant and mature by providing cited sources, child.

Act your damn age if you don't want to be compared to someone ten years your junior.
Reply
(2 Replies)
:iconmagiceve:
MagicEve Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2012
Link?
Reply
:iconspongemuffin:
SpongeMuffin Featured By Owner Mar 17, 2012
We are not pro-abortion. Pro-abortion means you want ALL pregnancies to end in abortion.

I'm pro-choice. I support women having the right to do with their bodies what they want. That you find problem with respecting women is really disturbing to me.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
March 10, 2012
Image Size
9.7 KB
Resolution
123×84
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
1,726
Favourites
77 (who?)
Comments
184
×